"Words to receive. Words to be received": reflections on the "Intercultural City museum work"

Lucia Parrino


Although diversity has always been a fundamental characteristic of human societies, now more than ever it has become central to the political and research agenda. The question of how we can live together while enjoying our differences is a fundamental issue of our time, and the city is viewed as the most promising site to negotiate identities. That being so, what is the role of museums? How can local museums develop interventions that address local cultural diversity issues?

In the first part of the article, I introduce the idea of Intercultural City museum work. I present a metadesign framework that aims to help museums emphasize the impact of diversity work on their local contexts, proposing the Intercultural City approach as a reference point. In the second part of the article, I describe the Intercultural City museum work and on using the metadesign framework with reference to MUST-Museo del Territorio Vimercatese, a civic museum on local history and identity in Vimercate, a town in the metropolitan area of Milan. Immigration to the geographical area over the past few decades and the resulting cultural diversity are neither reflected in the museum collections nor the permanent exhibitions. As a result, the museum decided to address these topics through services, events and special projects. In particular, I describe the exhibition Words to Receive. Words to be Received, designed and created by COI-Centro Orientamento Immigratia local immigrants resource centrewith the museum.


Intercultural City; Local cultural diversity; museums

Texte intégral :



Amin, A. (2002). Ethnicity and the multicultural city: living with diversity. Environment and Planning A, 34(6), 959980.

Anderson, G. (2012). A Framework: Reinventing the Museum. In G. Anderson (Ed.), Reinventing the Museum: The Evolving Conversation on the Paradigm Shift (2nd ed., pp. 110). Lanham (MD): AltaMira Press.

Ash, T. G., Mortimer, E., & Öktem, K. (2013). Freedom in Diversity. Ten Lessons for Public Policy from Britain, Canada, France, Germany and the United States. Oxford: University of Oxford.

Bodirsky, K. (2012). The Intercultural Alternative to Multiculturalism and its Limits. In Uncertainty and disquiet. 12th EASA Biennial Conference. Nanterre (France).

Bodo, S., Gibbs, K., & Sani, M. (Eds.). (2009). Museums as places for intercultural dialogue: selected practices from Europe. Dublin: Map for ID Group.

Bodo, S., & Mascheroni, S. (2012). Educare al patrimonio in chiave interculturale. Guida per educatori e mediatori museali. Milano: Fondazione ISMU.

Bott, V. (2003). Reflections: mapping cultural diversity in London's local authority museum collections. London: London Museums Agency.

Cantle, T. (2012). Interculturalism: The New Era of Cohesion and Diversity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Carrillo, D., D'Odorico, M., & Gilardoni, G. (2013). Benchmarking results: Modules, contexts and practices. In Fondazione ISMU (Ed.), EMILL. A tool reading integration practices and their respective contexts (pp. 2540). Milano: Fondazione ISMU.

Comune di Vimercate. (2012). Regolamento per la costituzione e il funzionamento della Consulta dei residenti privi di cittadinanza italiana. Vimercate. Retrieved from http://www.comune.vimercate.mb.it/PDF/IL COMUNE/REGOLAMENTI/Regcs.pdf

Comune di Vimercate. (2013a). Press release. MUST Vimercatese Territory Museum. Vimercate. Retrieved from http://www.museomust.it/drupal/sites/default/files/allegati_en/Must_Press_Release.pdf

Comune di Vimercate. (2013b). Vimercate in cifre. Vimercate. Retrieved from http://www.comune.vimercate.mb.it/PDF/SERVIZI/DEMOGRAFICI/VIMERCATE IN CIFRE_ 2013_con_intro.pdf

Council of Europe. (2013). The Intercultural City step by step. Practical guide for applying the urban model of intercultural integration. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

Council of Europe, & European Institute for Comparative Cultural Research. (2013). Intercultural cities index. A methodological overview. Retrieved from http://www.culturalpolicies.net/web/files/178/en/methodological_overview.pdf

Crooke, E. (2007). Museums and Community. Ideas, Issues and Challenges. New York: Routledge.

Dell'Orso, S. (2009). Musei e territorio. Una scommessa italiana. Milano: Mondadori Electa.

Dos Santos, P. A. (2008a). The relations between museology and community development: from the 90's and towards a new century. Cadernos de Sociomuseologia, 29(29), 117181.

Dos Santos, P. A. (2008b). The relations between museology and community development: society changes, museology changes. Cadernos de Sociomuseologia, 29(29), 47116.

Fischer, G., & Giaccardi, E. (2006). Meta-design: A Framework for the Future of End-User Development. End User Development, 9, 427457.

Florida, R. (2004). The rise of the creative class. Basic Books New York.

Giaccardi, E., & Fischer, G. (2008). Creativity and evolution: a metadesign perspective. Digital Creativity, 19(1), 1932.

Giglio, L. (2014, March 24). Vimercate, arriva la Kyenge. In comune per parlare di integrazione. MB News. Retrieved from http://www.mbnews.it/2014/03/vimercate-arriva-la-kyenge-in-comune-per-parlare-di-integrazione/

Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture. London: Routledge.

James, M. (2008). Interculturalism: Theory and Policy. London: The Baring Foundation.

Janssens, M., & Zanoni, P. (2009). Facilitating intercultural encounters within a global context: towards processual conditions. In M. Janssens, D. Pinelli, D. C. Reymen, & S. Wallman (Eds.), Sustainable cities. Diversity, economic growth, social cohesion (pp. 2644). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Khovanova-Rubicondo, K. (2009). Intercultural Cities. Intermediary evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/culture/cities/EvaluationInterculturalCities_en.pdf

Khovanova-Rubicondo, K., & Pinelli, D. (2012). Evidence of the Economic and Social Advantages of Intercultural Cities Approach. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/culture/Source/Cities/Review.doc

Kistemaker, R. E. (2006). Introduction to the conference. In R. E. Kistemaker (Ed.), City museums as centres of civic dialogue? Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the International Association of City Museums, Amsterdam, 3-5 November 2005 (pp. 46). Amsterdam: Amsterdam Historical Museum.

Lynch, B. (2011). Whose cake is it anyway? A collaborative investigation into engagement and participation in 12 museums and galleries in the UK. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.

Macdonald, S. (2003). Museums, national, postnational and transcultural identities. Museum and Society, 1(1), 116.

Macdonald, S. (2007). What moves? Museums and transculturalism. In Museums and transculturalism conference. Basel.

Mascia, M. (2014). MUST, un museo nel e per il territorio. In A. Marchesi (Ed.), MUST. Servizi e attività 2013 (p. 3). Vimercate.

Mitroff Silvers, D., Rogers, M., & Wilson, M. (2013). Design Thinking for Visitor Engagement: Tackling One Museum's Big Challenge through Human-centered Design. In N. Proctor & R. Cherry (Eds.), Museums and the Web 2013. Silver Spring, MD: Museums and the Web. Retrieved from http://mw2013.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/design-thinking/

Norris, L., & Tisdale, R. (2014). Creativity in Museum Practice. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities. (2012). The Ljubljana Guidelines on Integration of Diverse Societies. The Hague: OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities.

Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism. Cultural diversity and political theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pinelli, D. (2012). Diversità e sviluppo sostenibile: una relazione possibile. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Provincia di Milano, & Centro Studi PMI. (2007). Quaderno del Piano territoriale n.26. Sistema dei servizi di livello sovracomunale nella Provincia di Milano. Rapporto conclusivo - Luglio 2006. Firenze: Alinea Editrice.

Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence: the illusion of destiny. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Sze, L. (2010). Chinatown Then and Neoliberal Now: Gentrification Consciousness and the Ethnic-Specific Museum. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 17(5), 510529.

Uitermark, J., Rossi, U., & Van Houtum, H. (2005). Reinventing Multiculturalism: Urban Citizenship and the Negotiation of Ethnic Diversity in Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(3), 622640.

Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Super-Diversity and Its Implications, 29(6), 10241054.

Vertovec, S. (2010). Towards post-multiculturalism? Changing communities, conditions and contexts of diversity. International Social Science Journal, 61(199), 8395.

Wood, E. (2009). Rules for the (R)evolution of Museums. In C. Brown, E. Wood, & G. Salgado (Eds.), Inspiring Action: Museums and Social Change (pp. 2238). Edinburgh: MuseumsEtc.

Wood, P. (Ed.). (2009). Intercultural Cities. Towards a model for intercultural integration. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

Wood, P., & Landry, C. (2008). The Intercultural City. Planning for Diversity Advantage. London: Earthscan.

Young, L. (2005). Our lives, our histories, our collections. London: Museum of London. Retrieved from http://archive.museumoflondon.org.uk/RWWC/Essays/Essay2/

Zel?a S?mansone, I. (Ed.). (2013). Museums and intercultural dialogue. The Learning Museum Network Report 4. Riga: Mantoprint.

Zukin, S., & Braslow, L. (2011). The life cycle of New York's creative districts: reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplanned cultural zones. City, Culture and Society, 2(3), 131140.


  • Il n'y a présentement aucun renvoi.

© Alterstice  2010-2023 - ISSN 1923-919X

Établi avec le soutien de l’Association internationale pour la Recherche InterCulturelle (ARIC), du Centre de recherche Cultures-Arts-Sociétés (CELAT) et de l' équipe de recherche METISS . Le site est hébergé par le service informatique de la Faculté des Sciences Sociales de l'Université Laval (Québec, Canada) pour le laboratoire "Psychologie et Cultures".